Back to blog
Article Image

San Francisco, CA

In the early hours of August 1, 2023, a massive fire swept through a building under construction in San Francisco's Hayes Valley neighborhood, causing it to partially collapse. The San Francisco Fire Department reported the fire at 5:54 a.m. in the area of Octavia and Oak Streets. The fire quickly escalated, reaching four alarms by 6:30 a.m. Over 130 firefighters were deployed to the scene, battling the blaze with more than 40 fire apparatuses.

The fire extended to four neighboring buildings, causing significant water and fire damage. Occupants of these buildings were swiftly evacuated, and thankfully, no injuries have been reported. However, eight residents were displaced due to the incident. The fire's intensity was such that it damaged some of the fire apparatuses and even cracked windows across Octavia Boulevard, a six-lane street with an island in between, demonstrating the severity and heat of the fire.

The fire's heat was intense enough to crack windows across Octavia Boulevard, which runs parallel to Octavia Street along a several-block stretch. The fire department's spokesman, Captain Jonathan Baxter, explained that a building under construction burns quickly and at a higher intensity because it lacks doors, sprinkler systems, and walls that could limit the fire's spread.

The construction site, once a promising addition to the Hayes Valley neighborhood, is now a charred skeleton. Firefighters must remove all of the scaffolding surrounding the construction project before the streets around the burned structure can re-open, which may take several hours. This incident has severe implications for the developer, who now faces the daunting task of starting the entire project anew, if at all.

This incident serves as a stark reminder of the risks associated with urban development and the importance of stringent safety measures. As the city grapples with the aftermath, the focus now shifts to aiding the displaced residents and investigating the cause of the fire. The San Francisco Fire Department's fire investigation task force is currently probing the cause of the blaze, with the aid of a Contra Costa County Sheriff's K-9 unit.

Text Tim

Latest news and resources

Back to blogSell a property
Why Exchanging Your Bay Area Residential Property for Commercial Real Estate in 2025 Is a Winning Strategy

Are you a Bay Area landlord struggling with low cap rates, tenant turnover, and time-intensive management of your single-family rental?

With median home prices in San Francisco ($1.5M), San Mateo ($1.6M), Santa Clara ($1.3M), Alameda ($1.3M), and Contra Costa ($810,000) yielding cap rates of just 2.1%–4.0%, and tenant-friendly laws capping rent increases, residential investments are losing appeal.

Meanwhile, the commercial real estate market in 2025 offers higher yields, faster appreciation, and reduced management demands—especially in trending asset types like light industrial, retail, and flexible office spaces. By using a 1031 exchange to transition from residential to commercial properties in high-growth California markets like Sacramento, Fresno, or the Inland Empire, Bay Area investors can unlock superior returns and simplify their portfolios.

Here’s why making the switch in 2025 is a smart move, backed by data and tailored for San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Alameda, and Contra Costa counties.

The Bay Area Residential Struggle:

Low Yields, High HassleOwning a single-family rental in the Bay Area is increasingly challenging for small investors.

Let’s examine the data:

  • Low Cap Rates: Cap rates for single-family homes range from 2.1%–4.0% across Bay Area counties:
    • San Francisco: 2.2%–2.6% (some sources report averages below 2%)
    • San Mateo: 2.2%–2.7%
    • Santa Clara (San Jose): 2.2%–2.8%
    • Alameda (Oakland): 2.1%–2.7%
    • Contra Costa (Walnut Creek): 3.1%–4.0%

A $1.5M San Francisco home generates just $32,400–$39,600 in net operating income (NOI) annually, far below alternative investments like stocks (7–10% historical returns) or 10-year Treasury bonds (~3% in 2021).

  • Tenant-Favoring Laws: California’s Tenant Protection Act of 2019 caps rent increases at 5% plus inflation (max 10%), limiting your ability to offset rising expenses like property taxes ($9,700–$19,200/year) or maintenance. Evictions require just cause, and tenant buyouts to facilitate sales can cost $20,000–$50,000 in San Francisco, eroding profits.
  • Management Demands: With tenants turning over every 20 months, you’re spending 430–860 hours over 10 years (4–7 hours/month) on tasks like tenant screening, repairs, and compliance. This time burden is significant for small investors juggling other responsibilities.
  • Market Risks: Forecasts suggest a 1.8% price drop in the San Francisco metro area by November 2025, with San Jose prices remaining flat. High mortgage rates (6–7%) and increasing inventory (2.7 months in June 2025, up from 2.0 months) could further soften prices. If your total return (cap rate plus ~3% appreciation) falls below 5–7%, your capital—often $569,000–$1.12M in equity—is underperforming.

These challenges make residential rentals a tough sell for Bay Area investors seeking strong returns and passive income.

Why Commercial Real Estate in 2025 Is the Smarter Investment

Using a 1031 exchange to trade your Bay Area residential property for a commercial asset in high-growth California markets offers three key advantages: higher yields, faster appreciation, and lower management demands. Let’s explore trending commercial asset types—light industrial, retail, and flexible office spaces—and the data supporting this shift.

1. Higher Cap Rates for Better Yields

Commercial properties consistently outperform residential rentals in cap rates, especially in markets like Sacramento, Fresno, and the Inland Empire. In 2024, commercial cap rates stabilized, with forecasts for 2025 showing strong returns:

  • Light Industrial: 6–8% cap rates in logistics hubs like the Inland Empire and Central Valley, driven by e-commerce demand.
  • Retail: 6.5–7.5% cap rates, with low vacancy rates indicating strong tenant demand.
  • Flexible Office: 6–7% cap rates in markets adapting to hybrid work, with rising demand for co-working spaces.

Compare this to a San Francisco single-family home with a 2.5% cap rate ($37,500 NOI on a $1.5M property). Exchanging into a $1.5M light industrial property in Fresno with a 7% cap rate yields $105,000 annually—nearly tripling your cash flow. Even Class C multifamily properties in California offer 5–6% cap rates, a significant improvement over single-family homes.

2. Faster Appreciation in Emerging Markets

While Bay Area residential properties have historically appreciated (~7% annually from 2012–2022), forecasts for 2025 suggest stagnation or declines (e.g., 1.8% drop in San Francisco).

Commercial properties in emerging California markets, however, are poised for stronger growth:

  • Sacramento: Population growth and affordability drive commercial appreciation, with industrial lease rates projected to rise 3.8% annually in 2025. Areas like Natomas and Rancho Cordova are seeing increased investment due to job growth.
  • Inland Empire (Riverside/San Bernardino): Industrial properties benefit from e-commerce giants building distribution centers, with property values growing 48% faster than coastal regions.
  • Fresno: Lower entry costs ($800K–$1.5M) and available land make it a hotspot for industrial and retail development, with appreciation outpacing Bay Area residential markets.

For example, a $1.3M Santa Clara rental with $912,000 in equity and 2.8% cap rate could be exchanged for a $1.3M industrial property in the Inland Empire with a 7% cap rate and stronger appreciation potential, leveraging population and job growth to boost long-term value.

3. Lower Management Demands with Longer Leases

Residential rentals require constant oversight—tenant screening, repairs, and compliance with strict regulations. Commercial properties, particularly light industrial, offer significant relief:

  • Longer Leases: Commercial leases typically span 5–10 years, compared to 20-month residential turnovers. Light industrial tenants, like logistics or manufacturing firms, sign long-term leases, reducing vacancy costs and turnover hassles.
  • Tenant Responsibility: In triple-net (NNN) leases, common in industrial and retail properties, tenants cover maintenance, taxes, and insurance, slashing your management time to under 2 hours/month compared to 4–7 hours for residential.
  • Business Partnerships: Commercial tenants, especially in light industrial spaces, act as partners, maintaining properties to support their operations (e.g., warehouses for e-commerce). This contrasts with residential tenants, who often require hands-on management.

Light industrial properties are particularly low-maintenance due to their simple design (e.g., concrete floors, high ceilings) and high-demand tenants like e-commerce firms, driven by California’s role in global shipping. Retail properties are also trending, with experiential shopping spaces in Sacramento and Fresno attracting stable tenants.

Case Study: From Alameda to Sacramento

Consider Mark, an Alameda landlord with a $1.3M single-family home purchased in 2015 for $620,000. With $912,000 in equity and a 2.7% cap rate ($34,600 NOI), he spends 4–7 hours/month managing tenants and faces a $30,000 buyout to sell. Frustrated by low yields and rent control, Mark uses a 1031 exchange to sell and reinvest in a $1.3M light industrial warehouse in Sacramento. The new property offers:

  • 7% Cap Rate: $91,000 annual NOI, nearly tripling his cash flow.
  • Appreciation: Sacramento’s 3.8% annual lease rate growth and population influx suggest stronger value gains than Alameda’s flat 2025 forecast.
  • Minimal Management: A 7-year NNN lease with a logistics tenant reduces his workload to ~1 hour/month, with the tenant handling maintenance.

Mark defers ~$200,000 in capital gains taxes, boosts his returns, and frees up time, all while positioning his portfolio for growth in a thriving market.

Why 2025 Is the Year to Act

The commercial real estate outlook for 2025 supports this shift:

  • Stabilizing Cap Rates: Cap rate expansion has stalled, with industrial and retail properties offering attractive yields. Anticipated interest rate cuts in 2025 could lower borrowing costs, enhancing returns.
  • E-Commerce and Logistics Boom: Industrial demand in the Inland Empire, Central Valley, and Bay Area is surging, with lease rates up 3.8% annually. This trend favors light industrial investments.
  • Retail Resilience: Retail vacancy rates are low, with experiential spaces in high demand, making retail a stable choice.
  • Bay Area Market Cooling: With residential price declines projected (1.8% in San Francisco) and inventory rising (2.7 months), selling now maximizes your equity.

How to Execute a 1031 Exchange

  1. Evaluate Your Property: Work with Tim to assess your cap rate and equity. If returns are below 5–7%, consider selling.
  2. Get Referred To A Qualified Intermediary: Ensure tax deferral by partnering with a 1031 exchange expert
  3. Target Trending Assets: Focus on light industrial or retail in Sacramento, Fresno, or the Inland Empire for 6–8% cap rates and strong appreciation.
  4. Act Quickly: Identify replacement properties within 45 days and close within 180 days to comply with IRS rules.

Take the Next Step

If your Bay Area rental is yielding under 4%, tying up significant capital in equity, and demanding hours of management, 2025 is the year to cash out. A 1031 exchange into light industrial or retail properties in high-growth markets like Sacramento or the Inland Empire offers higher yields (6–8%), faster appreciation, and minimal management.

As a Bay Area investment property specialist, I can help you analyze your portfolio and identify high-return commercial opportunities.

Contact me for a free “Investment Property Health Check” to start your journey to smarter investing in 2025.

‍

August 5, 2025
No items found.
Is It Time to Cash Out of the Bay Area Residential Real Estate Market as an Investment Class?

For small investors in the Bay Area holding single-family rental properties, the dream of steady passive income is increasingly elusive. With median home prices soaring—$1.5M in San Francisco, $1.6M in San Mateo, $1.3M in Santa Clara and Alameda, and $810,000 in Contra Costa—cap rates remain stubbornly low, ranging from 2.1% to 4.0%.

Add in California’s tenant-favoring laws, frequent tenant turnover, and the high cost of buyouts to facilitate sales, and many investors are questioning whether residential real estate is still a viable investment class. According to Bankrate’s analysis, while a full housing market crash is unlikely, softening home prices (forecasted 1.8%–4.7% drop in San Francisco by late 2025) and high mortgage rates (6–7%) signal a potential turning point.

If you’re a Bay Area landlord with significant equity ($569,000–$1.12M) tied up in a low-yield property, it may be time to cash out and pivot to commercial properties—specifically light industrial assets—for higher cap rates, longer leases, and easier management.

Here’s why.

The Bay Area Residential Market: A Tough Road for Investors

Owning a single-family rental in the Bay Area is no longer the golden ticket it once was. Let’s break down the challenges:

1. Low Cap Rates Limit Returns

Cap rates for single-family homes in the Bay Area are dismal:

  • San Francisco: 2.2%–2.6% (Bankrate notes San Francisco’s cap rates often dip below 2% on average)
  • San Mateo: 2.2%–2.7%
  • Santa Clara (San Jose): 2.2%–2.8%
  • Alameda (Oakland): 2.1%–2.7%
  • Contra Costa (Walnut Creek): 3.1%–4.0%

For a $1.5M San Francisco home, you’re netting just $32,400–$39,600 annually after expenses like property taxes ($18,000/year), maintenance, and vacancies. Compare that to alternative investments like stocks (7–10% historical returns) or even 10-year Treasury bonds (3% in 2021), and the opportunity cost of holding a low-yield property is glaring. With Bankrate forecasting flat or declining home prices in 2025 due to high interest rates and increasing inventory, relying on appreciation to justify these low returns is risky.

2. Tenant-Favoring Laws Erode Profitability

California’s progressive tenant protection laws, such as the Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (AB 1482), cap rent increases at 5% plus inflation and require just-cause evictions. These regulations limit your ability to raise rents to match rising expenses (e.g., property taxes at 1.2% of value, or $9,700–$19,200/year) and complicate tenant turnover. If you’re dealing with a tenant who won’t leave, you may face costly legal battles or buyouts—often tens of thousands of dollars—to regain control of your property for a sale.

For example, in San Francisco, buyouts can range from $20,000 to $50,000 per tenant, further eating into your returns.

3. High Management Burden

With tenants turning over every 20 months, managing a Bay Area rental demands 430–860 hours over 10 years (4–7 hours/month), including tenant screening, repairs, and compliance with regulations. This time commitment, coupled with low cash flow, makes residential rentals less appealing for small investors balancing other responsibilities. Hiring a property manager (costing 8–10% of rent, or $500–$600/month) further reduces your already slim net operating income (NOI).

4. Market Risks on the Horizon

Bankrate highlights that while a housing market crash is unlikely, high interest rates and softening demand could lead to price stagnation or declines in 2025, particularly in high-cost areas like San Francisco. If your property’s total return (cap rate plus ~3% annual appreciation) falls below 5–7%, it may not justify the capital tied up—especially with $569,000 to $1.12M in equity locked in a single asset. Selling now, before potential price drops, could preserve your wealth for reinvestment.

The Case for Cashing Out: Why Commercial Properties Are the Better Bet

Instead of holding onto a low-yield, high-maintenance residential property, consider cashing out and reinvesting in commercial properties—particularly light industrial assets—through a 1031 exchange to defer capital gains taxes.

Here’s why this move makes sense:

1. Higher Cap Rates and Cash Flow

Commercial properties, especially in markets like Sacramento, Fresno, or San Diego, offer cap rates of 5–7% or higher, compared to the Bay Area’s 2.1%–4.0% for single-family homes. For example:

  • A $1.3M San Jose rental with a 2.8% cap rate generates ~$36,000/year in NOI.
  • Exchanging into a $1.3M light industrial property in Fresno with a 6.5% cap rate could yield ~$84,500/year—more than doubling your cash flow.

These higher yields provide a buffer against market volatility and make your investment work harder for you.

2. Longer Leases, Lower Turnover

Unlike residential tenants who turn over every 20 months, commercial tenants—especially in light industrial properties like warehouses or distribution centers—sign leases of 5–10 years. These longer terms reduce vacancy costs and management time. Many commercial leases, such as triple-net (NNN) agreements, shift maintenance responsibilities to tenants, further minimizing your workload. Instead of spending 15–30 hours per turnover on repairs and tenant screening, you’re managing stable, long-term business relationships.

3. Commercial Tenants as Business Partners

Residential tenants are often “occupants,” requiring oversight and frequent intervention. Commercial tenants, however, act as business partners. They have a vested interest in maintaining the property to support their operations, whether it’s a logistics company in a warehouse or a retailer in a strip mall. This partnership dynamic fosters mutual success, reducing conflicts and simplifying management. For light industrial properties, tenants like small manufacturers or e-commerce firms prioritize functionality, ensuring consistent rent payments and property upkeep.

4. Light Industrial: The Easiest to Manage

Among commercial asset classes, light industrial properties stand out as the easiest to manage. These assets—think small warehouses, flex spaces, or distribution centers—require minimal upkeep due to their simple design (e.g., concrete floors, high ceilings). Tenants often handle interior maintenance, and demand is surging due to e-commerce growth. In markets like Sacramento or Fresno, light industrial properties offer cap rates of 6–8% and attract reliable tenants with long-term leases, making them ideal for small investors seeking passive income.

Real-World Example: From Oakland to Fresno

Take Sarah, an Oakland landlord who bought a single-family home in 2015 for $620,000. Now worth $1.3M with $912,000 in equity, it yields a paltry 2.7% cap rate ($34,600/year NOI). Frustrated by tenant buyouts ($30,000 to vacate before a sale) and 4–7 hours/month of management, Sarah opts for a 1031 exchange. She sells her property and reinvests $1.3M into a light industrial warehouse in Fresno with a 7% cap rate ($91,000/year NOI) and a 10-year lease. Sarah defers ~$200,000 in capital gains taxes, triples her cash flow, and cuts her management time to under 2 hours/month, thanks to a reliable tenant handling maintenance.

Why Act Now?

Bankrate’s analysis suggests that while a housing crash is unlikely, the Bay Area’s high prices and low yields make residential rentals a tough sell for small investors. With tenant-favoring laws tightening, buyout costs rising, and potential price declines on the horizon, holding onto a low-cap-rate property could mean missing out on better opportunities. A 1031 exchange lets you cash out, preserve your equity, and pivot to commercial properties with:

  • Higher returns: 5–7%+ cap rates vs. 2.1%–4.0% for residential.
  • Less hassle: Long-term leases and tenant maintenance reduce your workload.
  • Stable partnerships: Business tenants align with your goals, unlike residential occupants.
How to Cash Out and Upgrade
  1. Assess Your Property: Work with a real estate agent to calculate your cap rate and equity. Is your return below 5–7%? If so, it may be time to sell.
  2. Engage a 1031 Expert: Partner with a qualified intermediary to navigate the exchange process and defer taxes.
  3. Target Light Industrial Properties: Look to markets like Sacramento or Fresno for assets with 6–8% cap rates and stable tenants.
  4. Close the Deal: Identify replacement properties within 45 days and close within 180 days to complete the exchange.

Ready to Make the Switch?

If your Bay Area rental is yielding less than 4%, tying up significant equity, and demanding too much time, it’s time to consider cashing out. By leveraging a 1031 exchange to invest in light industrial properties, you can unlock higher cash flow, simplify management, and build wealth with business partners, not occupants.

As a Bay Area investment property specialist, I can help you evaluate your options and find high-yield opportunities across California.

Contact me for a free Equity Analysis to see if now’s the time to pivot.

‍

August 5, 2025
No items found.
Using a 1031 Exchange to Upgrade to Higher-Yield Properties: A Smart Move for Bay Area Investors

Are you a Bay Area landlord feeling the squeeze of low cap rates and time-intensive property management? If you own a single-family home in San Francisco, San Mateo, or other high-cost Bay Area cities, you’re likely sitting on significant equity—potentially $569,000 to $1.12 million after a decade of ownership—but earning meager returns of just 2.1% to 4.0%. With tenant turnover every 20 months eating into your cash flow and demanding 4–7 hours of your time each month, it’s natural to wonder if there’s a better way to grow your wealth. The good news? A 1031 exchange can help you sell your low-yield investment property and upgrade to higher-yield, higher cash-flowing commercial assets elsewhere in California, all while deferring capital gains taxes. Here’s how Bay Area investors can make this strategic move to boost returns and simplify their portfolios.

The Bay Area Challenge: Low Cap Rates, High Effort

Owning a single-family rental in the Bay Area—whether in San Francisco ($1.5M median price), San Mateo ($1.6M), Santa Clara ($1.3M), Alameda ($1.3M), or Contra Costa ($810,000)—comes with challenges. Cap rates, which measure your annual return (net operating income divided by property value), are often dismal:

  • San Francisco: 2.2%–2.6%
  • San Mateo: 2.2%–2.7%
  • Santa Clara (San Jose): 2.2%–2.8%
  • Alameda (Oakland): 2.1%–2.7%
  • Contra Costa (Walnut Creek): 3.1%–4.0%

These low yields stem from sky-high property values driven by tech wealth and limited supply, making cash flow tough to achieve.

For example, a $1.5M San Francisco home might generate $32,400–$39,600 in annual net income after expenses like property taxes (~$18,000/year), maintenance, and vacancies. Meanwhile, managing tenants who turn over every 20 months requires 430–860 hours over 10 years—time you could spend elsewhere. Add in California’s strict regulations, like rent caps under the Tenant Protection Act of 2019, and the financial math often doesn’t add up.On top of that, market risks loom. Forecasts suggest a potential 1.8%–4.7% price drop in San Francisco by late 2025, driven by high mortgage rates (6–7%) and increasing inventory.

If your property’s total return (cap rate plus ~3% annual appreciation) falls below 5–7%, it may underperform compared to alternative investments like stocks (historically ~7–10% returns). For small investors with significant equity tied up, this is the inflection point where holding onto a low-yield rental becomes financially questionable.

The 1031 Exchange Solution:

Trade Up for Better ReturnsA 1031 exchange, named after Section 1031 of the IRS Code, allows you to sell your investment property and reinvest the proceeds into a “like-kind” property while deferring capital gains taxes. This strategy is a game-changer for Bay Area investors looking to unlock the equity in their single-family homes and transition to commercial properties with higher cap rates, better cash flow, and longer-term tenants.

Here’s why it’s a smart move:

1. Higher Cap Rates in Commercial Properties

Commercial properties—like multi-tenant retail centers, office buildings, or industrial spaces—often offer cap rates of 5–7% or higher in markets outside the Bay Area, such as Sacramento, Fresno, or San Diego. For example:

  • A $1.5M San Francisco single-family home with a 2.5% cap rate generates ~$37,500/year in net income.
  • Exchanging into a $1.5M commercial property in Sacramento with a 6% cap rate could yield ~$90,000/year—more than doubling your cash flow.
2. Longer-Term Tenancy, Less Hassle

Commercial leases typically span 5–10 years, compared to the 20-month tenant turnover common in Bay Area single-family rentals. This stability reduces vacancy costs and management time. Instead of spending 15–30 hours per turnover on tenant screening, repairs, and lease prep, you could manage a commercial property with professional tenants who often handle maintenance themselves (e.g., in triple-net leases).

3. Tax Deferral and Wealth Building

By deferring capital gains taxes, a 1031 exchange preserves your equity for reinvestment. For instance, selling a San Francisco property with $1.05M in equity (after a $450,000 remaining mortgage) lets you reinvest the full proceeds into a higher-yielding asset, compounding your returns over time.

Real-World Example: From San Jose to Sacramento

Consider Jane, a San Jose landlord who bought a single-family home in 2015 for $620,000 with a 20% down payment. Today, it’s worth $1.3M, with $912,000 in equity and a cap rate of 2.8% (~$36,000/year net income). Frustrated by the 4–7 hours/month spent managing tenants and low returns, Jane decides to sell.

Using a 1031 exchange, she sells the property and reinvests $1.3M into a multi-tenant retail strip in Sacramento, priced at $1.3M with a 6.5% cap rate (~$84,500/year net income). The commercial property has 7-year leases with stable tenants, cutting her management time to under 2 hours/month. Jane defers ~$200,000 in capital gains taxes, doubles her cash flow, and reduces her workload, all while diversifying into a growing market.

Why Look Beyond the Bay Area?

While the Bay Area offers strong appreciation, other California markets provide better cash flow and stability for commercial investments:

  • Sacramento: Median commercial properties (~$1M–$2M) offer 5.5%–7% cap rates, with strong demand from retail and office tenants.
  • Fresno: Lower entry costs (~$800K–$1.5M) and cap rates of 6–8% make it ideal for cash flow-focused investors.
  • San Diego: Stable commercial markets with 5–6.5% cap rates and long-term leases, balancing growth and income.

These markets have less competitive pricing than San Francisco or San Mateo, allowing your equity to stretch further and generate higher returns.Steps to Execute a 1031 Exchange

  1. Consult Experts: Work with a real estate agent specializing in investment properties and a qualified intermediary (QI) to handle the exchange process.
  2. Identify a Buyer: Market your Bay Area property to capitalize on its high equity, despite low cap rates. Highlight its appreciation potential to attract buyers.
  3. Select Replacement Properties: Within 45 days of closing, identify up to three commercial properties in higher-yield markets. Focus on assets with stable tenants and 5–7%+ cap rates.
  4. Close Within 180 Days: Complete the purchase of the new property, ensuring funds are held by the QI to maintain tax deferral.
  5. Verify Like-Kind Status: Ensure the new property qualifies (e.g., commercial real estate for investment purposes).

Is a 1031 Exchange Right for You?

If you’re a Bay Area investor with a single-family rental yielding under 4%, significant equity tied up, and a growing frustration with tenant turnover, a 1031 exchange could be your path to financial freedom. By upgrading to a commercial property with higher cap rates and longer leases, you can boost your cash flow, reduce management time, and defer taxes—all while positioning your portfolio for long-term growth.

Ready to explore your options? As a Bay Area investment property specialist, I can help you analyze your property’s cap rate, assess your equity, and identify high-yield commercial opportunities across California.

Contact me today for a free “Investment Property Health Check” to see if a 1031 exchange is your next smart move.

‍

August 5, 2025
No items found.
Is Renting Out A Single Family Home In The Bay A Smart Investment Strategy?

1. The capitalization rate is calculated as:

Cap Rate = (Net Operating Income (NOI) / Property Value)where NOI = Annual Rental Income - Operating Expenses (e.g., property taxes, insurance, maintenance, property management fees, and vacancy costs).

Cap rates reflect the return on investment for a property, excluding financing, and are influenced by location, demand, property type, and market conditions. In high-demand, high-cost areas like the Bay Area, cap rates are typically lower due to strong appreciation and lower perceived risk, often ranging from 3-5% for single-family homes, compared to 4-10% in less competitive markets.Bay Area Median Home Prices and Rental Data:Based on recent data (up to July 2025), median single-family home prices in the Bay Area vary significantly by county/city. Here are estimates for key cities, using median sale prices from real estate market sources, with rental income estimates based on market trends:

  • San Francisco:  
    • Median Price (2025): $1.5M  
    • Median Monthly Rent (2-3 bed single-family home): ~$4,500–$5,500  
    • Annual Gross Rent: $54,000–$66,000  
    • Operating Expenses (30-40% of gross rent, including taxes (1.2% of value), insurance ($2,000/year), maintenance (~1% of value), and 5% vacancy): ~$21,600–$26,400  
    • NOI: $32,400–$39,600  
    • Cap Rate: ~2.2%–2.6% ($32,400–$39,600 / $1.5M)
  • San Mateo:  
    • Median Price: $1.6M  
    • Median Monthly Rent: ~$4,800–$6,000  
    • Annual Gross Rent: $57,600–$72,000  
    • Operating Expenses: ~$23,000–$28,800  
    • NOI: $34,600–$43,200  
    • Cap Rate: ~2.2%–2.7%
  • Santa Clara (San Jose):  
    • Median Price: $1.3M  
    • Median Monthly Rent: ~$4,000–$5,000  
    • Annual Gross Rent: $48,000–$60,000  
    • Operating Expenses: ~$19,200–$24,000  
    • NOI: $28,800–$36,000  
    • Cap Rate: ~2.2%–2.8%
  • Alameda (Oakland):  
    • Median Price: $1.3M  
    • Median Monthly Rent: ~$3,800–$4,800  
    • Annual Gross Rent: $45,600–$57,600  
    • Operating Expenses: ~$18,200–$23,000  
    • NOI: $27,400–$34,600  
    • Cap Rate: ~2.1%–2.7%
  • Contra Costa (Walnut Creek):  
    • Median Price: $810,000  
    • Median Monthly Rent: ~$3,500–$4,500  
    • Annual Gross Rent: $42,000–$54,000  
    • Operating Expenses: ~$16,800–$21,600  
    • NOI: $25,200–$32,400  
    • Cap Rate: ~3.1%–4.0%
Analysis:  
  • Cap rates for single-family homes in the Bay Area are low (2.1%–4.0%), reflecting high property values driven by tech wealth, limited supply, and strong demand.
  • Lower-cost areas like Contra Costa offer higher cap rates (up to 4.0%) due to lower purchase prices relative to rents, making them more attractive for cash flow-focused investors.  
  • High-cost areas like San Francisco and San Mateo have lower cap rates (2.2%–2.7%), where investors often prioritize long-term appreciation over immediate cash flow.
  • These cap rates are below the 4-10% range typical for multifamily properties in less competitive markets, indicating that single-family homes in the Bay Area are less cash-flow efficient but benefit from significant appreciation potential.

2. Equity Tied Up in Investment Properties

Assumptions:  
  • Properties are held for 10+ years, as per your assumption.  
  • Most small investors use financing (e.g., 20–30% down payment) rather than purchasing all-cash, though some may have paid off mortgages over 10 years.  
  • Equity is the current property value minus any remaining mortgage balance.  
  • Bay Area homes have appreciated significantly over the past decade (e.g., ~7.79% annually from 2012–2022).

Equity Calculation:

Let’s estimate equity for a median-priced single-family home purchased 10 years ago (2015) in each city, assuming a 20% down payment and a 30-year fixed mortgage at 4% (typical for 2015). I’ll use 2025 median prices and assume 7% annual appreciation from 2015 purchase prices.

  • San Francisco:  
    • 2015 Median Price: ~$718,000  
    • Down Payment (20%): $143,600  
    • Initial Loan: $574,400  
    • 2025 Value: $1.5M  
    • Remaining Mortgage (after 10 years): ~$450,000 (using amortization schedule)  
    • Equity: $1.5M - $450,000 = $1,050,000  
    • Equity as % of Value: ~70%
  • San Mateo:  
    • 2015 Median Price: ~$764,000  
    • Down Payment: $152,800  
    • Initial Loan: $611,200  
    • 2025 Value: $1.6M  
    • Remaining Mortgage: ~$478,000  
    • Equity: $1.6M - $478,000 = $1,122,000  
    • Equity as % of Value: ~70%
  • Santa Clara:  
    • 2015 Median Price: ~$620,000  
    • Down Payment: $124,000  
    • Initial Loan: $496,000  
    • 2025 Value: $1.3M  
    • Remaining Mortgage: ~$388,000  
    • Equity: $1.3M - $388,000 = $912,000  
    • Equity as % of Value: ~70%
  • Alameda:  
    • 2015 Median Price: ~$620,000  
    • Down Payment: $124,000  
    • Initial Loan: $496,000  
    • 2025 Value: $1.3M  
    • Remaining Mortgage: ~$388,000  
    • Equity: $1.3M - $388,000 = $912,000  
    • Equity as % of Value: ~70%
  • Contra Costa:  
    • 2015 Median Price: ~$386,000  
    • Down Payment: $77,200  
    • Initial Loan: $308,800  
    • 2025 Value: $810,000  
    • Remaining Mortgage: ~$241,000  
    • Equity: $810,000 - $241,000 = $569,000  
    • Equity as % of Value: ~70%
Analysis:  
  • Small investors typically have significant equity (~70% of current value) due to appreciation over 10 years, even with initial financing.  
  • Equity ranges from ~$569,000 (Contra Costa) to ~$1.12M (San Mateo), reflecting higher appreciation in pricier areas.  
  • This equity represents a substantial portion of the investor’s net worth, which can limit liquidity and increase opportunity costs if tied up in a low-yielding property (given low cap rates).  
  • If the property is mortgage-free (possible after 10+ years), equity equals the full property value ($810,000–$1.6M), further increasing the capital tied up.

3. Time Input for Managing an Investment Property (Avg. 20-Month Tenant Turnover)

Assumptions:  
  • Tenant turnover occurs every 20 months over a 10-year period (120 months), resulting in ~6 turnovers (120 / 20 = 6).  
  • The investor self-manages the property (common for small investors with 1–2 properties) rather than hiring a property manager (which would cost ~8–10% of rent).  
  • Time estimates are based on typical landlord responsibilities in California, accounting for strict regulations like the Tenant Protection Act of 2019, which caps rent increases and requires just-cause evictions.
Time Breakdown:  
  • Finding and Screening Tenants (per turnover):  
    • Advertising, showings, and application processing: ~10–20 hours  
    • Background/credit checks, lease preparation: ~5–10 hours  
    • Total per Turnover: ~15–30 hours  
    • Over 10 Years (6 turnovers): 90–180 hours
  • Move-In/Move-Out Coordination:  
    • Inspections, coordinating repairs/cleaning: ~5–10 hours per turnover  
    • Over 10 Years: 30–60 hours
  • Ongoing Management (per year):  
    • Rent collection, tenant communication: ~10–20 hours/year  
    • Maintenance/repairs (e.g., responding to issues, coordinating contractors): ~10–20 hours/year  
    • Total per Year: ~20–40 hours  
    • Over 10 Years: 200–400 hours
  • Turnover Repairs/Renovations:  
    • Minor repairs, painting, cleaning between tenants: ~10–20 hours per turnover  
    • Over 10 Years: 60–120 hours
  • Administrative Tasks:  
    • Taxes, insurance, compliance with regulations: ~5–10 hours/year  
    • Over 10 Years: 50–100 hours
  • Total Time Over 10 Years:  
    • Low Estimate: 90 (tenant screening) + 30 (move-in/out) + 200 (ongoing) + 60 (repairs) + 50 (admin) = 430 hours (~43 hours/year, or ~4 hours/month)  
    • High Estimate: 180 + 60 + 400 + 120 + 100 = 860 hours (~86 hours/year, or ~7 hours/month)
Analysis:  
  • Managing a single-family rental requires ~4–7 hours/month on average, with spikes during tenant turnover (15–30 hours per event).  
  • California’s strict landlord regulations increase administrative time, especially for lease compliance and rent increase calculations.
  • For small investors, this time commitment can be significant, especially if balancing a full-time job or other properties. Hiring a property manager (costing ~$500–$600/month in the Bay Area) could reduce time but lower NOI and cap rates further.

4. Inflection Point for Financial Responsibility

The inflection point where carrying a second home as an investment becomes financially irresponsible depends on the investor’s goals (cash flow vs. appreciation), opportunity costs, and financial constraints. Let’s evaluate key factors:Key Considerations:  

  • Low Cap Rates: At 2.1%–4.0%, Bay Area single-family homes generate modest cash flow compared to alternative investments (e.g., 10-year Treasury bonds at 3% in 2021). Investors rely on appreciation, but this ties up significant capital ($569,000–$1.12M in equity).
  • Opportunity Costs: Equity tied up in a low-yield property could be invested elsewhere (e.g., stocks at ~7–10% historical returns or other real estate markets with higher cap rates).  
  • Carrying Costs: High property taxes (~1.2% of value, or $9,700–$19,200/year), insurance, and maintenance erode cash flow, especially if rents are capped by regulations.
  • Tenant Turnover Risks: Frequent turnover (every 20 months) increases vacancy costs (5–10% of annual rent) and repair expenses, reducing NOI.  
  • Market Risks: Forecasts suggest a potential 1.8%–4.7% price drop in San Francisco by late 2025, driven by high mortgage rates (6–7%) and increasing inventory. A prolonged downturn could reduce equity and make selling less viable.
  • Time Commitment: ~4–7 hours/month may be unsustainable for small investors with limited time, especially if unexpected issues (e.g., evictions, major repairs) arise.  
  • Liquidity Constraints: With ~70% equity tied up, selling incurs high transaction costs (6% realtor fees, ~$48,600–$96,000), and reinvesting elsewhere may be challenging in a high-cost market.

Inflection Point Scenarios:  

  • Cash Flow Breakeven: If NOI barely covers expenses and mortgage payments (if any), the property may not justify the time and capital. For example, in San Francisco ($1.5M property, $32,400–$39,600 NOI), monthly cash flow after expenses is $2,700–$3,300. If mortgage payments ($3,000/month for remaining $450,000 at 4%) exceed this, the investor loses money monthly.  
  • Opportunity Cost Threshold: If alternative investments (e.g., S&P 500 at 7% return) yield more than the property’s cap rate + appreciation (e.g., 2.5% + 3% = 5.5%), the investor may be better off selling and reinvesting. For $1M in equity, a 7% return elsewhere yields $70,000/year vs. $25,000–$40,000 NOI from the property.  
  • Market Downturn: A 5% price drop ($75,000–$80,000 for a $1.5M–$1.6M property) could erase annual appreciation gains, making it harder to justify holding if cash flow is minimal.  
  • Time Burden: If the investor values their time at, say, $50/hour, the 43–86 hours/year (430–860 hours over 10 years) equates to $2,150–$4,300/year in “labor cost,” further reducing effective returns.

Critical Inflection Point:

Carrying a second home becomes financially irresponsible when the total return (cap rate + annual appreciation) falls below the investor’s opportunity cost (e.g., 5–7% for alternative investments) and the time commitment significantly impacts their lifestyle or other income sources. For example:  

  • In San Francisco, a 2.5% cap rate + 3% appreciation = 5.5% total return, below the 7% stock market average. With $1M in equity tied up and ~4–7 hours/month of management time, the investor may find better returns elsewhere with less effort.  
  • In Contra Costa, a 4.0% cap rate + 3% appreciation = 7% return, matching alternative investments, but the lower equity tied up ($569,000) and similar time commitment make it more viable for cash flow-focused investors.
Recommendations:  
  • Sell if Cash Flow is Negative: If NOI doesn’t cover expenses and mortgage (if applicable), or if cash flow is minimal (<$1,000/month after all costs), selling may be prudent, especially in high-cost areas like San Francisco or San Mateo.  
  • Hold for Appreciation: If the investor can tolerate low cash flow and believes in long-term appreciation (historically ~7% annually in the Bay Area), holding may make sense, particularly in stable markets like Santa Clara or Alameda.
  • Diversify: Consider selling and reinvesting in markets with higher cap rates (e.g., Sacramento, with median prices ~$550,000 and higher yields) or other asset classes to reduce risk and improve liquidity.
  • Outsource Management: If time is a constraint, hiring a property manager can reduce the burden but will lower NOI by ~8–10%, pushing cap rates even lower.
    ‍

Explore Alternative Investment Opportunities:

Commercial PropertiesWhile investing in a single-family home in the Bay Area can offer compelling benefits like appreciation and rental income, diversifying your portfolio by exchanging residential properties for commercial properties—specifically light industrial buildings—can provide unique advantages. These properties, often home to showrooms, small businesses, or warehouses, are increasingly sought after in the Bay Area due to the region’s vibrant economy and demand for flexible commercial spaces.

Light industrial buildings typically attract stable tenants, such as artisanal manufacturers, tech startups, or retail showrooms, who sign long-term leases (often 5 to 15 years), reducing vacancy risks and ensuring predictable cash flow compared to the shorter-term leases common in residential rentals.One key benefit of light industrial properties is the prevalence of triple net (NNN) leases, where tenants are responsible for property taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs. This structure minimizes the landlord’s operational responsibilities, allowing you to focus on maximizing returns rather than managing day-to-day upkeep. Additionally, the Bay Area’s robust demand for commercial spaces, driven by its proximity to major markets and innovation hubs, supports strong appreciation potential for light industrial properties, often with less exposure to the volatility of the residential housing market.

Example: $2,000,000 Light Industrial Building Exchange

To illustrate the potential of this investment strategy, consider exchanging a residential property for a $2,000,000 light industrial building in the Bay Area through a 1031 exchange, which allows you to defer capital gains taxes. Suppose the property generates $140,000 in annual net operating income (NOI) from long-term leases with stable tenants, such as a showroom for a local furniture designer or a logistics company. The capitalization rate (cap rate), a key metric for evaluating commercial real estate, is calculated as NOI divided by the property’s purchase price:

Cap Rate = NOI ÷ Purchase Price = $140,000 ÷ $2,000,000 = 7%

A 7% cap rate is competitive in the Bay Area’s commercial market, where cap rates for light industrial properties typically range from 5% to 8%, depending on location, tenant quality, and lease terms.

This cap rate reflects a solid return on investment before accounting for potential appreciation.Now, let’s break down the cash flow. Assume you finance the $2,000,000 property with a 30% down payment ($600,000) and secure a commercial mortgage for the remaining $1,400,000 at a 5% interest rate with a 25-year amortization period. Using a standard mortgage calculator, the annual debt service (principal and interest) would be approximately $100,000.

The cash flow is calculated as:Cash Flow = NOI − Debt Service = $140,000 − $100,000 = $40,000 per year

This translates to a cash-on-cash return of:Cash-on-Cash Return = Cash Flow ÷ Down Payment = $40,000 ÷ $600,000 = 6.67%

This $40,000 in annual cash flow, combined with the stability of long-term leases and potential tax benefits (such as depreciation), makes light industrial properties an attractive option. Over time, as rents increase with market trends or lease escalations (often 2–3% annually), the NOI and cash flow could grow, further enhancing returns. Additionally, the property’s value may appreciate due to the Bay Area’s strong demand for commercial spaces, providing a dual benefit of income and capital growth.

Why Consider Light Industrial?

Light industrial properties are less susceptible to the rapid price swings seen in the Bay Area’s residential market, offering a hedge against housing market volatility. Tenants in these spaces, such as small businesses or e-commerce fulfillment centers, are often less likely to relocate due to the specialized nature of the facilities, ensuring lease stability. Furthermore, the Bay Area’s limited supply of industrial-zoned land can drive long-term value, making these properties a strategic addition to your portfolio.

Take the Next Step

If you’re intrigued by the potential of commercial real estate, consider exchanging your residential property for a light industrial building through a 1031 exchange to defer capital gains taxes. Work with a real estate professional or investment advisor to identify properties with creditworthy tenants, long-term leases, and strong cap rates in the Bay Area’s thriving commercial market.

Text/call me today and let's find a time to discuss your unique situation and timeline.

‍

‍

August 7, 2025
No items found.
Buying a Co-op in San Francisco: What You Need to Know

San Francisco’s real estate market is notoriously expensive and competitive, making homeownership a challenge for many. Cooperative housing, or co-ops, offers a unique and often more affordable way to own a home in the city. Unlike traditional homeownership, buying a co-op means purchasing shares in a corporation that owns the building, giving you the right to live in a specific unit. This guide explores the ownership structure of co-ops in San Francisco, outlines the buying process, and highlights key considerations to help you decide if a co-op is the right choice for you.Understanding Co-op Ownership in San Francisco.

A housing cooperative in San Francisco is a corporation that owns a residential building or complex. When you buy into a co-op, you purchase shares in this corporation rather than owning your unit outright, as you would with a condominium. The number of shares you own depends on factors like the size, location, or value of your unit. For instance, a larger unit or one with premium views, such as those overlooking the Golden Gate Bridge, may require a higher share allocation, impacting both the purchase price and monthly maintenance fees.As a shareholder, you receive a proprietary lease, which grants you exclusive rights to occupy your unit and participate in the co-op’s governance. This structure creates a strong sense of community, as residents collectively own and manage the building through an elected board of directors. The board handles decisions on maintenance, repairs, and house rules, while shareholders vote on major decisions, like approving new buyers or funding capital improvements.

Co-ops differ from condominiums, where you own your unit as real property and share common areas through a homeowners’ association. In a co-op, the corporation owns the entire property, and your monthly maintenance fees cover building upkeep, property taxes, utilities, and sometimes insurance. This can make co-ops more affordable, as you avoid individual real estate taxes and certain closing costs, like title insurance. However, co-ops often have stricter bylaws and require board approval for purchases, sales, or rentals, emphasizing the cooperative’s focus on a cohesive community.In San Francisco, co-ops are less common than condos or tenancy-in-common properties but are found in neighborhoods like Pacific Heights or Nob Hill. Some are market-rate, priced based on the local market, while others are limited-equity co-ops, subsidized to provide affordable housing for low- or moderate-income buyers.

The city’s Community Opportunity to Purchase Act, enacted in 2019, supports co-op development by giving nonprofits a right of first offer on multi-unit buildings, potentially increasing affordable co-op options.The Process of Buying a Co-op in San FranciscoPurchasing a co-op in San Francisco involves a distinct process compared to buying a condo or single-family home.

Here are the key steps:

  1. Review the Co-op’s Bylaws: Begin by studying the co-op’s bylaws, which outline ownership qualifications, rules, and restrictions. Some co-ops prohibit renting units or limit pets, while others require minimum liquid assets (often 12-24 months of maintenance fees) or specific debt-to-income ratios (typically 25-30%). Understanding these rules ensures you meet the co-op’s standards and align with its community values.
  2. Secure Financing: Financing a co-op can be trickier than for a condo, as fewer lenders offer co-op loans, and they often require higher down payments (20-30% or more). Some high-end San Francisco co-ops may even demand all-cash purchases due to restrictive bylaws. Work with a lender familiar with co-op financing to navigate these challenges and confirm the building is on their approved lending list.
  3. Submit an Application: The co-op board requires a detailed application, including financial statements, tax returns, credit reports, and personal references. This “board package” demonstrates your financial stability and compatibility with the co-op’s community. In San Francisco, boards may focus on your ability to cover maintenance fees, which include property taxes and can range from $500 to over $1,000 monthly, depending on the building.
  4. Attend a Board Interview: If your application is strong, you’ll be invited to interview with the co-op board. This step ensures you’re a good fit for the community, as co-ops prioritize residents who share their values and contribute to a harmonious environment. Be ready to discuss your financial situation, lifestyle, and reasons for joining the co-op. Avoid overly critical questions during the interview to maintain a positive impression.
  5. Close the Sale: Once approved, work with a real estate attorney experienced in co-op transactions to finalize the purchase. At closing, you’ll receive a stock certificate and proprietary lease instead of a deed, reflecting your share ownership. The closing process is often simpler than for condos, with lower costs due to the absence of title insurance or mortgage recording taxes.

Key Considerations Before Buying a Co-opBefore committing to a co-op, evaluate these factors to ensure it fits your needs and lifestyle:

  • Community and Governance: Co-ops thrive on community, so assess whether the building’s culture aligns with your values. Attend open houses or talk to residents to gauge the atmosphere. Review board meeting minutes to understand the co-op’s management style and financial health, as poor governance can lead to unexpected assessments or maintenance issues.
  • Financial Implications: Co-ops can be more affordable upfront, with median prices often 10-20% lower than condos, but maintenance fees are higher due to bundled expenses like property taxes. Ensure your budget accounts for these ongoing costs and potential special assessments for repairs or upgrades.
  • Resale and Rental Restrictions: Co-op boards often impose strict rules on selling or renting units, which can limit your flexibility. For example, some co-ops restrict rentals to two out of every four years or require board approval for sublets, affecting income potential. Resale values may also appreciate more slowly than condos due to these restrictions.
  • San Francisco Market Dynamics: With median home prices around $1.35 million in 2025, San Francisco’s real estate market remains one of the priciest in the U.S. Co-ops offer a more accessible entry point, especially in limited-equity models, but inventory is limited, and competition is intense in desirable neighborhoods. Research market trends and work with a local real estate agent to find opportunities, including off-market listings.

Why Choose a Co-op?Co-ops in San Francisco provide a cost-effective alternative to traditional homeownership, with lower purchase prices and reduced closing costs compared to condos or single-family homes. They also foster a tight-knit community, appealing to buyers who value shared decision-making and neighborly connections. However, the unique ownership structure, financing challenges, and board approval process require careful preparation.

To succeed, partner with a real estate professional and attorney who specialize in San Francisco co-ops. Luckily, you're in the right place. Schedule a call with myself and our inhouse attorney, Andrew Oldham, and we can run you through the process ahead in detail.

‍

July 9, 2025
No items found.
Buildings Covered by the San Francisco Rent Ordinance (Rent Control and Just Cause Eviction Protections)

In San Francisco, the Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (Rent Ordinance), enacted in 1979, governs rent control and eviction protections for tenants. Below, I outline which buildings are covered by the Rent Ordinance (where tenants cannot be evicted without just cause) and which are exempt (where landlords can issue notices to vacate more freely, subject to state law). I’ll also clarify the rules for investors based on the ordinance and related state laws, like the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act and the California Tenant Protection Act (AB 1482).

Buildings Covered by the San Francisco Rent Ordinance (Rent Control and Just Cause Eviction Protections)

The Rent Ordinance applies to most residential units built on or before June 13, 1979, with some exceptions. For these properties, landlords cannot issue a notice to vacate unless they have one of the 16 specified "just cause" reasons outlined in the ordinance. These just causes include fault (tenant-related) and no-fault (landlord-related) reasons, such as non-payment of rent, owner move-in (OMI), or Ellis Act evictions.

Buildings and Units Covered:

Multi-unit residential buildings (apartments, flats, etc.) with two or more units constructed before June 13, 1979. These units typically have both rent control (limits on annual rent increases) and just cause eviction protections.

In-law or accessory dwelling units (ADUs) built before June 13, 1979, or unauthorized units that existed before this date and were later brought up to code. These are considered part of multi-unit buildings and are covered unless otherwise exempt.

Residential hotels built before 1979, where tenants have established tenancy (continuous occupancy for 32 days or more).

  1. Single-family homes or condominiums under specific conditions:
      If the tenant moved in before January 1, 1996, these units have both rent control and just cause eviction protections.If the unit was vacant due to a no-fault eviction (e.g., a prior 30- or 60-day notice), the new tenant inherits full rent control and eviction protections.If the single-family home or condo has housing code violations cited and uncorrected for at least six months before the vacancy, the new tenant gets full protections.If the condo is owned by the subdivider (developer) and not yet sold, or is the last unsold unit and the subdivider lived there for at least a year after subdivision, it’s covered.

Units with tenant-based assistance (e.g., Section 8 vouchers) may have eviction protections under the Rent Ordinance, and sometimes rent control, depending on the program. Tenants in such units should consult a local housing rights organization.

Key Eviction Restrictions for Covered Units:
  • Landlords must provide a just cause for eviction, such as:
      Fault-based: Non-payment of rent, breach of lease, nuisance, or illegal use of the unit.No-fault: Owner move-in (OMI), relative move-in (RMI), Ellis Act (removing all units from the rental market), capital improvements, demolition, or substantial rehabilitation.

No-fault evictions often require relocation payments (e.g., up to $10,000 per tenant or $30,000 per household in 2025, with higher amounts for seniors, disabled tenants, or families).

OMI evictions are tightly regulated: the landlord must move in within three months and live there for at least 36 months, and only one OMI is allowed per building.

Ellis Act evictions require a 120-day notice (or one year for seniors or disabled tenants) and prohibit re-renting the unit for 10 years unless offered to the evicted tenant at their prior rent.

Tenants cannot be evicted simply because their lease expires or without a valid just cause.

Implications for Investors:If you invest in a building covered by the Rent Ordinance, you cannot issue a notice to vacate at will. You must comply with just cause requirements, provide proper notice (e.g., 3, 30, 60, or 120 days depending on the cause), and potentially pay relocation costs. Additionally, rent increases are capped annually (e.g., 1.4% for March 1, 2025, to February 28, 2026). This limits your flexibility to turn over tenants or reset rents to market rates unless the tenant voluntarily vacates (known as vacancy decontrol).

Buildings Exempt from the San Francisco Rent Ordinance (Where Notices to Vacate Can Be Issued More Freely)

Certain buildings are exempt from the Rent Ordinance, meaning they are not subject to rent control or just cause eviction protections under local law. For these properties, landlords can generally issue notices to vacate without a just cause, provided they follow state law requirements (e.g., California Civil Code Section 1946.1). However, AB 1482, effective January 1, 2020, may impose statewide rent caps and just cause eviction protections on some exempt units, depending on their age and ownership.

Buildings and Units Exempt from the Rent Ordinance:

Single-family homes and condominiums where the tenant moved in on or after January 1, 1996, unless they qualify for protections due to prior no-fault evictions, code violations, or subdivider ownership (as noted above). These units are exempt from rent control due to the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act (1995).

Buildings constructed after June 13, 1979 (with a certificate of occupancy issued after this date), unless they are live-work units or have been significantly remodeled to trigger newer protections.

Fully owner-occupied buildings with fewer than three units, where the owner lives in one unit and rents out the others.

Subsidized housing controlled by another government agency (e.g., HUD housing projects), unless they have tenant-based assistance like Section 8, which may grant eviction protections.

Residential hotels where the tenant has occupied the unit for less than 32 continuous days.

Non-residential units or units with commercial use, such as live-work spaces no longer used residentially.

Institutional housing, such as dormitories, hospitals, convents, monasteries, or residential care facilities.

Nonprofit cooperatives owned, occupied, and controlled by a majority of residents, or units solely owned by a nonprofit public benefit corporation with resident-majority boards and bylaws requiring resident approval for rent increases.

Sole lodger arrangements, where a single tenant lives with the owner who retains access to the tenant’s area (exempt from both local and state just cause protections).

Notice to Vacate Rules for Exempt Units:
  • For exempt units, landlords can issue a 30-day or 60-day notice to vacate under California law without stating a just cause, unless AB 1482 applies:
      A 30-day notice is sufficient for tenants who have lived in the unit for less than one year.A 60-day notice is required for tenants who have lived in the unit for one year or more.

If the notice is mailed, an additional five days must be added to the notice period.

  • AB 1482 applies to many exempt units built before January 1, 2005 (i.e., 15 years old or older as of 2020) unless the property is:
      A single-family home or condo owned by an individual (not a corporation, REIT, or LLC with corporate members).A duplex where the owner occupies one unit.Subsidized housing, dormitories, or other exempt categories under state law.

For units covered by AB 1482, landlords must provide a just cause for eviction (similar to San Francisco’s ordinance) and cap annual rent increases at 5% plus inflation or 10%, whichever is lower. Just causes under AB 1482 include fault-based reasons (e.g., non-payment of rent) and no-fault reasons (e.g., owner move-in or withdrawal from the rental market).

Implications for Investors:If you invest in exempt buildings (e.g., single-family homes rented after January 1, 1996, or post-1979 constructions), you have greater flexibility to issue notices to vacate without a just cause, provided you comply with state notice periods (30 or 60 days) and AB 1482 if applicable. You can also set rents at market rates without local rent control restrictions, except where AB 1482 imposes caps. However, you must verify whether AB 1482 applies, as it extends protections to many newer buildings. For example, a single-family home owned by a corporation or a multi-unit building built between 1979 and 2005 may require just cause and relocation payments under AB 1482.

Practical Considerations for Investors
  1. Verify Building Status:
      Check the building’s construction date using city property records or the Assessor’s database to confirm if it was built before or after June 13, 1979.Review eviction history at the local Rent Board or court records to determine if prior no-fault evictions grant new tenants rent control.Inspect for housing code violations at the Department of Building Inspection, as these can trigger protections.
  2. Understand Just Cause Requirements:
      Even in exempt buildings, AB 1482 may require just cause for eviction. Always consult a tenant rights attorney or the Rent Board to confirm.No-fault evictions (e.g., OMI or Ellis Act) in covered buildings require relocation payments and strict compliance with notice and filing requirements.
  3. Tenant Buyouts:
      In covered buildings, landlords may offer buyouts to encourage voluntary vacancy, but these are heavily regulated. Agreements must be filed with the Rent Board, tenants have a 45-day rescission period, and landlords must disclose tenant rights.Buyouts allow vacancy decontrol, letting you reset rents to market rates, but improper buyouts can lead to fines or lawsuits.
  4. Legal Risks:
      Attempting to evict without just cause in a covered building can result in wrongful eviction lawsuits, with penalties including damages and $100/day fines under California Civil Code Section 789.3.Even in exempt buildings, improper notices (e.g., failing to provide 60 days for long-term tenants) can invalidate the eviction process.
  5. Consult Experts:
      Contact the San Francisco Rent Board or a counselor for clarification on your property’s status.Work with a property manager or tenant attorney familiar with San Francisco’s complex rental laws to avoid costly mistakes.

‍

Final Notes for Investors

San Francisco’s rental laws are highly tenant-friendly, and the Rent Ordinance significantly limits your ability to evict tenants or raise rents in pre-1979 buildings. Investing in exempt properties (e.g., newer buildings or single-family homes rented after 1996) offers more flexibility, but you must navigate AB 1482 protections for units built before 2005. Always verify your property’s status with the Rent Board or a legal professional, as errors can lead to costly lawsuits or fines. For example, a 2024 online discussion highlighted a tenant facing a 13.6% rent increase in a 1973 townhouse, mistakenly thought to be exempt from rent control due to Costa-Hawkins, underscoring the need to understand exemptions.

If you have a specific property in mind, provide its address or details (e.g., construction date, unit type), and I can help analyze its status under the Rent Ordinance and state law. For further assistance, contact the San Francisco Rent Board or consult a local expert.

Disclaimer: McMullen Properties is not a lawyer; please consult one.

‍

July 9, 2025
No items found.
First-time Buyers Can Afford Single-Family Homes in San Francisco Again

In the bustling real estate market of San Francisco, the idea of owning a single-family home has often seemed like a distant dream for many first-time buyers due to sky-high prices. However, a significant shift in the market dynamics, combined with smart financing options like the FHA 203k loan, is now making this dream a tangible reality.

The Opportunity at Hand

Let's consider a scenario that's now more common in San Francisco: a fixer-upper in a decent neighborhood, which was once out of reach, now listed for $950,000. With an FHA 203k loan, not only can you afford to buy this home, but you can also finance up to $200,000 in renovations, bringing the total cost to $1,150,000. Here’s the kicker: once renovated, similar homes in the area are appraised at around $1,500,000, a figure that would be unattainable for many first-time buyers if they were buying a move-in-ready property.

Understanding FHA 203k Loans

The FHA 203k loan program is designed to help buyers purchase homes that need repair or modernization. Here's how it works:

  • Loan Limits: For 2025, in high-cost areas like San Francisco, the limit for a single-family home is $1,209,750, which comfortably covers our example scenario.
  • Down Payment: With an FHA loan, you can put down as little as 3.5%, but let's look at a 10% down payment for a more conservative approach.
  • Eligibility: You need a credit score generally around 580 for the minimum down payment, but better rates and terms often come with higher scores. You also need to occupy the home as your primary residence.

Breaking Down the Numbers

Let's calculate the monthly payments for our example:

  • Purchase Price: $950,000
  • Renovation Budget: $200,000
  • Total Loan Amount: $1,150,000 (minus 10% down payment)

With a 10% down payment:

  • Down Payment: $115,000 (10% of $1,150,000)
  • Loan Amount after Down Payment: $1,035,000

Mortgage Details:

  • Interest Rate: Let's use 7% for this example.
  • Loan Term: 30 years

‍Calculations:

‍Monthly Payment (Principal & Interest):

  • P=r⋅PV1−(1+r)−n

Where P is the monthly payment, r is the monthly interest rate (0.07/12), PV is the loan amount ($1,035,000), and n is the number of payments (360 for 30 years):

  • P≈0.005833⋅1,035,0001−(1+0.005833)−360≈6,036.150.8736≈6,909.76

Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP):

  • Upfront MIP: 1.75% of loan amount, which can be financed, so we'll not count it as an immediate cost here.
  • Annual MIP: For loans over 90% LTV, 0.85% of the loan annually, divided by 12 for monthly:
  • Monthly MIP≈1,035,000×0.008512≈737.50

Total Monthly Payment:

  • Principal & Interest: $6,909.76
  • MIP: $737.50
  • Total: $7,647.26

The Argument for Affordability

Now, imagine this scenario:

  • You're buying into a neighborhood where post-renovation homes sell for $1.5 million.
  • Your monthly payment on a home you've tailored to your taste is around $7,647.26, inclusive of mortgage insurance.

To put this into perspective, if you were to buy a home in San Francisco already renovated and priced at $1.5 million with traditional financing, you'd need a 20% down payment. That's $300,000 upfront, plus the costs of closing, moving, and immediate home improvements or adjustments. With conventional loans, your monthly mortgage payment would also include principal and interest, but without the advantage of the FHA's lower down payment and the ability to roll renovation costs into the mortgage.

Now, contrast this with our scenario using an FHA 203k loan for the same property, where after renovations, it's worth $1.5 million. Here, you only need a 10% down payment on the pre-renovation price, which is $115,000 for a $1,150,000 total (purchase plus renovations). This significantly lowers the barrier to entry, reducing your initial cash outlay by nearly $185,000. Additionally, the FHA loan includes the cost of renovations within the mortgage, easing your immediate financial burden further. While the monthly payments with FHA might include mortgage insurance, they could still be comparable or even less than traditional financing due to the lower loan amount and interest rates often associated with government-backed loans. This approach not only makes homeownership more accessible but also allows you to customize your living space from the get-go, potentially increasing the home's value and your satisfaction with your investment.

‍Why this is your opportunity:

  • Value Appreciation: You're essentially getting into the market at a price point where the property's value after your renovations could be significantly higher, potentially offering equity from day one.
  • Customization: You get to design your future home, making it not just a place to live but an investment in your lifestyle and preferences.
  • Lower Initial Cost: The current market allows entry at a lower price point than if you were buying a home already in pristine condition.
  • Long-term Investment: Real estate in San Francisco has historically appreciated. Owning a home here, even if it starts as a project, could be one of the best financial decisions for your future.

Conclusion

The current market conditions in San Francisco, combined with the flexibility of FHA 203k loans, present a unique window for first-time buyers to step into the housing market. This isn't just about owning a home; it’s about investing in your future at a time when the stars align in terms of pricing and financing. If you've been on the sidelines, now might be the moment to jump in, renovate, and reap the benefits of homeownership in one of the world's most vibrant cities. Remember, understanding your financing options is key to unlocking this opportunity.

July 9, 2025
No items found.
Accelerating San Francisco's Housing Development: First City To Miss New Legislation

San Francisco has recently marked a significant milestone, albeit a dubious one, as the first city in California to fall short of its state-mandated housing goals. This failure has triggered the activation of Senate Bill 423 (SB423), a robust piece of legislation aimed at streamlining housing approvals in the city. Authored by State Senator Scott Wiener, SB423 represents a transformative shift in San Francisco’s housing development landscape, potentially reshaping the future of its urban core.

Streamlining Approvals: A Necessity for Growth

The California Department of Housing and Community Development's recent ruling underscored San Francisco's shortfall in meeting its housing targets. The city was mandated to plan for 82,000 new units from 2023 to 2031 but has managed to authorize a mere 3,870 units in the last 18 months. This stark discrepancy has not only spotlighted the inefficiencies in the city’s permitting processes but also catalyzed the need for legislative intervention.

SB423 simplifies the previously complex and protracted approval procedures by allowing most housing projects to bypass the Planning Commission. This means that projects can avoid lengthy appeals to the Board of Supervisors and circumvent extensive environmental reviews unless they involve large developments or properties with historic resources. Such streamlining is critical in a city where the permitting process could stretch up to two years.

The Implications of SB423

This new law is a game-changer for San Francisco, promising to reduce the average approval time from 26 months to a mere six months for most projects. This expedited process is a welcome development for both market-rate and affordable housing developers who have been hamstrung by bureaucratic delays and high construction costs. By reducing the timeframe for approvals, SB423 effectively lowers the cost of development, making it financially feasible to kickstart projects that were previously on hold.

Developers like Chris Foley are already gearing up to take advantage of this new regulatory environment. Foley plans to submit an application for a 200-unit, 23-story tower on the edge of the Castro neighborhood, highlighting the readiness of developers to jumpstart their projects under the new law.

Economic and Social Benefits

The faster approval process introduced by SB423 is not just a bureaucratic relief but a significant economic booster. It allows developers to respond more agilely to market demands, facilitating a quicker turnaround on housing supply. This is particularly pertinent in San Francisco, where the demand for housing significantly outstrips supply, contributing to some of the highest real estate prices in the nation.

Moreover, by enabling more housing projects to come online faster, SB423 supports the city's economic diversity, allowing workers across different income brackets to afford living in the city. This diversity is essential for the sustainable growth of San Francisco, ensuring it remains a vibrant, multi-faceted metropolis.

Addressing the Critics

Critics of SB423 argue that the law could lead to uncontrolled development, potentially undermining the architectural integrity and historical character of neighborhoods. However, these concerns must be balanced against the acute need for more housing. San Francisco's charm and character can indeed be preserved even as we embrace more streamlined development processes that address the urgent demand for housing.

Conclusion: Embracing a Future of Possibilities

As SB423 rolls out, it is a watershed moment for San Francisco. The law stands as a bold step towards addressing the housing crisis head-on, promoting a more dynamic and inclusive approach to urban development. For a city that is a beacon of innovation and progress, embracing such legislative changes is crucial to ensuring it remains at the forefront of sustainable and equitable urban development.

For more insights into how these changes could impact your property investments or development plans, feel free to text me with questions.

July 9, 2025
San Francisco
Bay Area Housing Market 2024: Challenges and Market Trends

The Bay Area housing market remains a hot commodity, contrary to popular belief. The market has been showing extraordinary signs of resurgence lately despite rates not loosening.

Current Market Overview

Data from March 2024 reveals a significant year-over-year jump in median sold prices, solidifying the upward trend. This sustained growth highlights the Bay Area housing market's resilience and reflects the ongoing demand for homes in the region. While short-term fluctuations are possible, the overall outlook points toward continued price appreciation.

A key indicator of a market's health is the median sold price of existing single-family homes. According to the California Association of Realtors (C.A.R.), the San Francisco Bay Area saw a notable surge in this metric in March 2024, with a median sold price of $1,386,500. This represents a significant increase from both the previous month's figure of $1,256,500 and the same period last year, translating to a 10.3% rise month-over-month and a substantial 15.5% jump year-over-year.

Market Dynamics and Buyer Behavior

This spike in median sold price reflects the robust demand for housing in the Bay Area. This demand is fueled by a number of factors, including a booming job market, appealing amenities, and the region's reputation as a tech hub.

Bay Area Sales Activity: A Mixed Bag

The rising median sold price paints a rosy picture, but for a well-rounded view of the market, it's crucial to delve into sales figures. March 2024 saw a sharp 31.7% month-over-month increase in Bay Area sales, indicating a surge in buying activity. However, compared to the same period last year, there's a contrasting trend with a 5.4% year-over-year decline in sales. This fluctuation in sales figures highlights the Bay Area's nuanced market. Consumer confidence and external factors significantly impact buying behavior. Despite the slight year-over-year dip, the month-over-month sales surge suggests underlying resilience in the Bay Area housing market.

Regional Housing Data: March 2024

Examining the regional data helps to get a clearer picture of the Bay Area housing market in March 2024. By dissecting the median sold price of existing single-family homes alongside sales figures, we can uncover specific trends in each county:

  • Alameda County: Alameda saw a steep 7.7% increase in median sold price from February, reaching $1,400,000. This is on top of a significant 16.2% surge compared to March 2023. Sales activity also remained robust, with a 31.2% month-over-month jump, despite a slight 3.7% year-over-year dip.
  • Contra Costa County: The median sold price climbed to $890,000, reflecting a 4.7% month-over-month rise and a solid 9.5% year-over-year increase. However, sales activity showed a steeper decline of 21.0% compared to March 2023, hinting at potential shifts in buyer behavior.
  • Marin County: Marin witnessed a remarkable surge in both median sold price and sales activity. The median price reached a staggering $1,957,500, representing a 21.6% month-over-month increase and a substantial 22.3% rise year-over-year. This confirms Marin County's status as a highly desirable market for both buyers and sellers.
  • Napa County: Despite a slight dip in median sold price compared to February, Napa held steady at $880,000. However, sales activity experienced a notable decline of 18.1% year-over-year, suggesting potential challenges in the local market.
  • San Francisco County: San Francisco saw a significant increase in median sold price, reaching $1,745,000, with a 9.7% month-over-month rise and a more modest 2.6% year-over-year increase. Sales activity remained robust, indicating continued demand in the city's real estate market.
  • San Mateo County: San Mateo experienced a substantial increase in both median sold price and sales activity. The median price hit $2,170,000, reflecting a 12.9% month-over-month jump and a significant 16.7% rise year-over-year. This further solidifies the county's position as a highly sought-after destination for homebuyers.
  • Santa Clara County: The median sold price climbed to $1,910,000, with a 5.6% month-over-month increase and a notable 12.4% rise year-over-year. Sales activity surged by an impressive 49.2% compared to March 2023, highlighting the county's strong market dynamics.
  • Solano County: The median sold price remained stable, with a slight month-over-month increase to $584,950. However, sales activity experienced a 5.9% decrease compared to March 2023, highlighting potential challenges in the county's real estate market.
  • Sonoma County: Sonoma witnessed a steady increase in both median sold price and sales activity. The median price reached $865,000, reflecting a 4.7% month-over-month rise and a 4.3% year-over-year increase. This suggests Sonoma remains an attractive option for homebuyers.

Bay Area Housing Forecast: 2024 and Beyond

The Bay Area, consistently topping lists of priciest U.S. real estate and boasting dense populations, remains a housing market powerhouse. Encompassing nine counties (Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma) and over 100 municipalities, the region centers around San Francisco, Oakland, and the largest, San Jose. Let's delve into predictions for the Bay Area housing market in 2024 and 2025.

The San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward region continues to see steady growth in home values, with the average property reaching $1,176,322 – a modest 2.8% increase over the past year. Homes are also moving quickly, going into pending status in an average of just 13 days. Here's a closer look at some key market indicators:

  • Market Forecast: Analysts at Zillow predict continued growth with a 1.3% increase expected over the next year.
  • For-Sale Inventory: The current inventory sits at 5,176 homes, offering a selection for buyers.
  • New Listings: Market activity remains healthy with 2,595 new listings added in the last month.
  • Negotiation Dynamics: The median sale-to-list ratio of 1.006 suggests a balanced market where list prices are fairly close to final sale prices.
  • Median Sales: The median sale price for existing single-family homes is currently $992,417, while the median list price sits at $974,667.
  • Competitive Landscape: Over half (52.5%) of homes sold above the asking price in February, highlighting a competitive market. However, there's still negotiation room, with 37.6% of sales closing below the list price.

Buyer's or Seller's Market?

The current Bay Area market leans slightly towards sellers. The combination of steady home value growth, low inventory, and competitive bidding situations creates an environment that favors sellers. However, the recent dip in year-over-year sales growth and the increasing number of homes selling below list price suggest a gradual shift towards a more balanced market.

Will the Bay Area Housing Market Crash in 2024?

Home prices in the Bay Area are not experiencing a significant drop. While the year-over-year growth rate might be moderating, the overall trend points towards continued appreciation, albeit at a potentially slower pace than in previous years. Experts aren't predicting a housing market crash in the Bay Area. The region's strong economic fundamentals, limited housing supply, and high demand are likely to continue supporting home values. However, a slight correction or a period of slower growth can't be entirely ruled out.

Is Now a Good Time to Buy a House in the Bay Area?

The question of whether 2024 is a good time to buy a house in the Bay Area is multifaceted and depends on various factors, including personal circumstances, financial situation, and long-term objectives. Here are some considerations to aid in this decision:

  • Market Conditions: While the market has seen a slight decline in home values over the past year, the forecast suggests a potential uptick. If the forecast aligns with your investment horizon, it might be a favorable time.
  • Competitive Nature: The high percentage of sales over the list price indicates a competitive market. Buyers should be prepared for potential bidding wars and act swiftly.
  • Interest Rates: Consider prevailing interest rates, as they influence your borrowing costs. If rates are relatively low, it could be advantageous for buyers.
  • Long-Term Goals: Evaluate if buying aligns with your long-term goals. If you plan to settle in the Bay Area for a considerable period, purchasing a home can be a prudent investment.

Ultimately, the decision to buy a house in the Bay Area in 2024 should be based on a comprehensive assessment of your unique circumstances and careful consideration of the market conditions and trends outlined by Zillow.

SF Bay Area Real Estate Investment Outlook

The San Francisco Bay Area is a magnet for real estate investors, but understanding the market landscape is critical. Here's a breakdown of key factors for informed investment decisions:

  • Enduring Demand: The Bay Area's allure for homebuyers remains strong, fueled by tech industry jobs and stunning natural beauty. This steady demand is a key factor for investors to consider.
  • Location is King: From vibrant downtowns to charming suburbs, the Bay Area boasts diverse neighborhoods. Meticulous research is essential, as each micro-market offers varying growth potential and rental yields.
  • Rental Market Strength: Evaluate the rental market performance in your chosen area. Robust rental demand can be advantageous for investors seeking income properties.
  • Picking Your Property: Will you invest in single-family homes, multi-unit buildings, or something else? Each type presents unique advantages and risks. Align your investment goals and risk tolerance with your property selection.
  • Expert Insights: Consulting with real estate professionals and economists is vital. Their market forecasts and insights can equip you to make informed investment decisions.

Why are Houses So Expensive in San Francisco?

The high cost of housing in San Francisco can be attributed to several factors:

  • Strong Economy: The Bay Area is a global tech hub, home to Silicon Valley, and numerous tech giants. The region's strong economy attracts high-income professionals, leading to increased demand for housing, and driving up prices.
  • Limited Supply: Geographical constraints and strict zoning regulations limit new construction in San Francisco. The supply of housing struggles to keep up with the growing demand, resulting in scarcity and rising costs.
  • High Land Costs: The cost of land in San Francisco is exceptionally high, which makes it expensive for developers to acquire land for new housing projects. This cost is often passed on to homebuyers and renters.
  • Foreign Investment: San Francisco's reputation as a global city attracts international investors, further driving up property values.
  • Desirability: The city's quality of life, cultural attractions, and natural beauty make it a highly desirable place to live, leading to a willingness to pay a premium for housing.
  • Limited Space for Growth: San Francisco is surrounded by water on three sides, leaving limited room for urban expansion. This geographical constraint intensifies competition for available properties.

Is Real Estate Investment a Good Option in this Region?

Investing in the Bay Area's real estate market can be both lucrative and challenging. Here are some considerations:

  • Lucrative Returns: Despite high prices, rental rates in San Francisco are also substantial, making it possible to generate good rental income.
  • Appreciation Potential: The Bay Area's strong economy suggests that property values are likely to appreciate over time.
  • Diversification: San Francisco is known for its tech industry, and investing in real estate diversifies your investment portfolio, which may be tech-heavy.
  • Challenges: High property prices mean a substantial initial investment. Additionally, property management and regulations can be complex.
  • Risk Mitigation: Careful property selection, understanding market dynamics, and working with local experts can help mitigate risks.

Investor Preferences in the Bay Area

Investors in the Bay Area have various options to consider:

  • Residential Properties: Single-family homes and condos are attractive for long-term rental income.
  • Multi-Family Units: Apartments or multi-unit buildings can offer multiple rental income streams.
  • Commercial Real Estate: Office and retail properties may provide stable rental income, particularly in business districts.
  • Short-Term Rentals: With tourism being a significant part of the Bay Area's economy, short-term rentals through platforms like Airbnb can be profitable.
  • Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): For those seeking to invest without direct property ownership, REITs focused on the Bay Area offer an alternative.

Economy and Growth

The San Francisco Bay Area boasts a robust and diverse economy, primarily driven by the technology sector, often referred to as Silicon Valley. This economic powerhouse has led to sustained growth, high incomes, and a robust job market, making it a hotspot for professionals and businesses. As a result, the region consistently attracts individuals seeking employment opportunities, which, in turn, fuels the demand for housing.

Housing Supply Shortage vs. Demand

The Bay Area faces a persistent challenge with housing supply shortages. Geographical constraints, coupled with stringent zoning regulations, limit the construction of new housing units. This limitation in supply collides with the consistently high demand for housing, primarily from tech professionals and other high-income earners. The resultant scarcity drives up property prices, making homeownership and rentals expensive propositions in the region.

Geography & Zoning Restrictions

Geography plays a significant role in the Bay Area's real estate market dynamics. Surrounded by water on three sides, the region has limited space for urban expansion. As a result, land is at a premium, and developers often face challenges in acquiring suitable land for housing projects. Zoning regulations, aimed at preserving the unique character of different neighborhoods, can further limit the potential for new construction. These factors collectively contribute to the scarcity of housing and rising property values.

Luxury Real Estate Market

The Bay Area hosts a thriving luxury real estate market, catering to high-net-worth individuals and investors. Luxury properties in prestigious neighborhoods like Atherton, Hillsborough, and Bel Air offer premium amenities and stunning views. The region's desirability, coupled with a strong economy, has sustained the luxury real estate segment, making it an attractive option for those seeking upscale investments.

High Real Estate Appreciation Rate

Despite the high cost of entry, real estate in the San Francisco Bay Area is known for its impressive appreciation rates. The region's strong economic fundamentals and limited supply have historically driven property values upward. This means that real estate investments often offer the potential for substantial capital gains over time.

Conclusion

While San Francisco's high housing costs can be a barrier, the region's strong economy and desirability continue to attract investors. Careful consideration of factors such as property type, location, and market dynamics is crucial for making informed investment decisions in the San Francisco Bay Area. Investors should assess their goals, risk tolerance, and long-term strategies to determine whether this market aligns with their investment objectives.

‍

July 9, 2025
No items found.
Berkeley Considers Allowing Homeowners to Sell ADUs as Condos

Berkeley is on the verge of becoming California's first city to allow homeowners to sell accessory dwelling units (ADUs) as condominiums. This initiative is based on Assembly Bill 1033, enacted this year, which permits cities to let residents sell their ADUs independently from their primary homes.

The New Ordinance

The Berkeley City Council has directed staff to draft an ordinance that would authorize these sales, aligning with AB 1033, authored by Assemblyman Phil Ting. Ting sees this as a significant opportunity for affordable homeownership, allowing more people to achieve the California dream. The ordinance is expected to be presented to the City Council within a year.

Potential Impact

If implemented, the new law could open up the market for first-time homebuyers, including teachers, nurses, and other essential workers, to purchase 500-square-foot homes in a city where the typical home value is nearly $1.5 million. This move is part of Berkeley's broader strategy to address the housing crisis, earning it the designation of a "pro-housing city" by the state.

ADU Market Dynamics

The construction of ADUs has surged across California, with nearly one in five new homes being an ADU. Berkeley built 410 ADUs between 2019 and 2023, reflecting a statewide trend driven by laws that make it easier to build these units. San Jose is also considering adopting AB 1033, with recommendations expected in June.

Challenges and Considerations

Despite the potential benefits, the cost of building an ADU can be prohibitive for lower- and middle-income homeowners. Additionally, homeowners within existing homeowners associations (HOAs) will need to secure permission from their HOA before converting an ADU into a condo. Real estate brokers have also raised questions about whether these units will be treated as single-family homes or as part of a tenant-in-common agreement.

Conclusion

Berkeley's move to allow the sale of ADUs as condos represents a significant shift in addressing the housing shortage. This initiative could provide more affordable housing options and help residents build equity. As the city prepares to implement this ordinance, it will be crucial to navigate the challenges and ensure that the benefits reach those who need them most.

For more details, you can read the full article on The Real Deal.

Text me with your thoughts.

‍

July 9, 2025
No items found.
Hotwire's Karl Peterson Sells San Francisco Home for $24M

Karl Peterson, co-founder of Hotwire and prominent venture capitalist, has sold his Presidio Heights home for $24 million. This sale sets a new benchmark in San Francisco's 2024 real estate market.

The Property and Its Controversial Pickleball Court

Located at 3630 Jackson Street, this home became notable not just for its luxury but for the controversy surrounding its private pickleball court. Originally listed at $36 million a year ago, the property saw price adjustments, settling at $29 million before closing at $24 million. Noise complaints about the pickleball courts across the street impacted potential sales, with one buyer backing out due to the disturbances. Despite these challenges, the Petersons added their own private pickleball court, which further fueled public-court players' discontent.

Details of the Sale

The buyer, identified as 3630 Jackson LLC, has Texas ties, with both the real estate attorney and principal address located in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. The listing agent, Steve Mavromihalis of Compass, declined to comment due to a non-disclosure agreement. The Petersons originally purchased the home for $16.65 million in 2013 and invested an additional $10 million into renovating the 1917 Julia Morgan-designed house.

Luxurious Features and Renovations

This expansive 12,000-square-foot residence boasts eight bedrooms, 7.5 baths, and a range of luxury features, including a ground-floor speakeasy/karaoke lounge with three disco balls, multiple panic/safe rooms, and a two-car garage with a dog washing station. Many north-facing rooms offer stunning views of the Presidio, bay, and Golden Gate Bridge. The primary suite is particularly lavish, featuring two walk-in closets, each with its own bathroom.

Market Context and High-End Sales Trends

Holly Peterson mentioned that their teenagers' attendance at boarding school and the renovation of another San Francisco property prompted the sale. The Petersons also own homes in Aspen and South Bend, Indiana. The ultra-high-end market in San Francisco is showing signs of revival, with other significant sales occurring in the city. A recent Pacific Heights listing sold for just under $24 million, breaking the $20 million mark for the first time this year. In contrast, other high-end sales in northern neighborhoods have averaged closer to $10 million, with several deals currently in contract around this price point.

Conclusion

The sale of Karl Peterson's Presidio Heights home highlights the dynamic nature of San Francisco's luxury real estate market. Despite noise controversies and fluctuating prices, the successful sale at $24 million underscores the city's enduring appeal and the resilience of its high-end property sector.

For more details, you can read the full article on The Real Deal.

Text me with questions.

‍

July 9, 2025
No items found.
California's Investor Resurgence: San Jose Leads the Way

The first quarter of 2024 marked a significant milestone in the U.S. housing market, with investor purchases rising for the first time since 2022. Investors snapped up approximately 44,000 homes nationwide, representing a 0.5% year-over-year increase. California, particularly San Jose, emerged as a pivotal player in this resurgence, highlighting Silicon Valley's relentless demand.

San Jose: The Beacon of Investor Confidence

San Jose stood out with a remarkable 27.8% year-over-year increase in investor activity. This surge underscores the enduring appeal of Silicon Valley, where tech-driven economic stability continues to attract substantial real estate investment. Despite rising interest rates and borrowing costs, investors are drawn to San Jose's robust market, characterized by its innovation-driven economy and high return on investment opportunities.

Trends in Investor Purchases

The overall trend indicates a strategic focus on affordable single-family homes. These homes, often seen as high-value investments, saw a 3.9% annual increase in purchases. Single-family homes constituted 68.9% of investor buys in the first quarter, signaling a preference for stable, long-term investments. Notably, investors set a new record by purchasing 26.1% of low-priced homes, a substantial increase from previous years. This shift towards more affordable segments aims to maximize ROI, reflecting a calculated response to current market conditions.

California's Market Dynamics

California's housing market, with its diverse economic drivers, continues to offer attractive investment opportunities. San Jose's growth is a testament to the region's resilience and the sustained demand for housing in tech-centric areas. Investors are capitalizing on the market's dynamics, leveraging the consistent demand and appreciating property values in areas like Silicon Valley.

Comparative Market Performance

While San Jose saw a significant increase, other regions displayed varied performance. Miami led in investor market share at 30.6%, highlighting its appeal in the investment landscape. On the flip side, Cincinnati experienced the largest decline at 22.1%, reflecting regional disparities in market conditions and investor confidence.

Impact of Return-to-Office Policies

The resurgence in metropolitan housing demand is also influenced by corporations mandating a return to office work. As employees flock back to city centers, areas like San Jose are witnessing increased demand, further driving investor interest. Conversely, remote destinations that saw a boom during the pandemic are experiencing a steep decline in demand, as the remote work trend wanes.

Future Outlook

The current trend suggests a cautious but optimistic outlook for real estate investments, particularly in technology-driven regions like San Jose. As investors continue to navigate rising costs and market fluctuations, California's housing market remains a focal point for strategic investments. The state's combination of economic stability, innovation hubs, and high demand ensures its position as a prime investment destination.

For more details, you can read the full article on The Real Deal.

Text me with questions.

‍

July 9, 2025
No items found.

Schedule a call

tim@mcmullen.properties
+1 (415) 691 9272
Silicon Valley, CA
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
“Get the most money, prep and marketing for your home while minimizing the stress and time it takes to sell it.”
-
Derek
"Tim helped make my first home buying experience easy and straightforward, giving me good and honest advice on evaluating houses, making offers, negotiating, and generally being very responsive to questions or concerns that I had during the process."
-
Janette
“After meeting with a few real estate agents, we decided to choose Tim for our home purchase and we were not disappointed. Tim was always a text or a phone call away and provided us with everything we needed and more. He was with us every step of the way during the experience and we couldn’t have asked for a better agent. He is extremely knowledgable of the current market landscape and helped us negotiate for an offer below asking in the San Francisco market (amazing right?!). He is kind, friendly and will always have your best interest in mind when he is assisting in your home purchase. We wholeheartedly believe that if we had chosen another real estate agent to work with we might not have been able to purchase our home since Tim brings a bunch of intangible skills to the table that other agents simply do not possess. We would highly recommend Tim to our friends and family and we will not think twice about working with him again in the future.”
-
Elam
“I highly recommend Tim! He knows the market very well and he is a very knowledgeable and responsive real estate agent. If you want to work with an expert who looks out for you and your best interest, Tim is the best choice!”
-
Yajesh
“My husband and I were the first time home buyers. We contacted Tim just couple of months after moving to San Francisco. Tim really helped us to learn about different neighbourhoods in SF. He showed us all the apartments that we wanted to visit even the ones that we could not afford. He is a good negotiator and we end of buying an apartment below the asked price.”
-
Sarah
“I highly recommend Tim as a realtor to help sell your home! He comes with all the skills and contacts (contractors, stagers, designers, etc.) to make the process successful. He is a great listener and highly responsive. We could not have asked more from a realtor to help us selling our first home. Thanks Tim!”
-
Frank

Join 4,000+ startups growing with Untitled

Start your 30-day free trial today.
Chat to sales
Get started

Tim joined the Oldham Group @ Compass in 2025, adding 45+ agents & countless years of expertise and service to his business.

Explore
BuySellSearch homesLandlords
Company
BlogAbout usInvestContact
Contact
+14156919272
tim@mcmullen.properties

The Oldham Group is a team of real estate agents affiliated with Compass. Compass is a licensed real estate broker licensed by the State of California and abides by Equal Housing Opportunity laws. License Number 01527235. All material presented herein is intended for informational purposes only and is compiled from sources deemed reliable but has not been verified. Changes in price, condition, sale or withdrawal may be made without notice. No statement is made as to the accuracy of any description. All measurements and square footage are approximate. If your property is currently listed for sale this is not a solicitation.

DRE #
02016832